Accessibility

Accessibility Requirements In The Digital World: Is Your Website At Risk?

Posted on 

When most people think about accessibility, they picture wheelchair ramps and elevators. But in today's digital world, accessibility is just as critical online as it is in physical spaces. If your website doesn't meet established standards, the consequences can be quick and expensive. You risk ADA website compliance issues, lost customers, and a damaged reputation.

Think of it as the digital version of holding the door open — if people can’t get inside, nothing else matters.

ADA Website Compliance and Global Standards

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) didn't set specific web rules. Still, courts and regulators say that digital businesses must follow the same accessibility standards as physical ones. That interpretation gained more support in 2024 when the Department of Justice updated its rules. Now, state and local governments must make their websites and mobile apps accessible. While private businesses weren't named directly, most lawsuits and settlements reference WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the practical benchmark. For developers, that means the guidelines you already know — WCAG 2.1 AA — are increasingly being treated as the law, not just advice.

Europe is also raising the bar. As of June 2025, the European Accessibility Act (EAA) requires companies selling digital products or services in the EU to follow accessibility rules aligned with WCAG standards. In other words, ignoring accessibility can shut you out of global markets.

Logos for Section508, the European Accessibility Act, and ACA overlaid on an image of legal paraphernalia.

Lawsuits are piling up. In the first half of 2024, more than 1,100 digital accessibility cases were filed in U.S. courts. ADA complaints reached 8,800 last year, up seven percent year over year. U.S. retailers who fall short on accessibility feel it directly on their bottom line. Customers abandoning difficult-to-navigate sites add up to $6.9 billion in lost sales every year.

One thing is clear: Accessibility should be a priority for your app or website.

The Rise of "Lawsuit Mills"

There's another factor behind the growing wave of claims. "Lawsuit mills" are firms that pump out hundreds of accessibility lawsuits a year, often using nearly identical filings. Their strategy isn't to argue each case in depth but to pressure companies into settling quickly. Rather than pursuing full trials, they depend on volume — filing near-identical complaints to pressure settlements.

The Wall Street Journal profiled one small business that ended up spending about $46,000 in legal fees plus $13,000 in website updates after being sued. That's a substantial financial hit for something that could have been addressed earlier and at a fraction of the cost.

Abstract graphic displaying Wall Street Journal figures for the amount of money spent on legal fees ($46,000) and website updates ($13,000) for a small business.

Why Shortcuts Don't Work

With so much at stake, it's no surprise that "quick fix" tools promise to solve accessibility overnight. Plugins, automated scanners, and AI overlays often market themselves as silver bullets. In reality, they only spot 20 to 30% of issues and leave the tougher problems untouched. Worse, some overlays even make the user experience harder for people relying on assistive tech. These tools rarely solve anything that a determined user with their own assistive software couldn't already work around.

So why do so many businesses still reach for them? The appeal of simplicity is strong, but the reality is different. Web accessibility audits remain the most dependable way to understand how a real person experiences your site. Accessibility isn't static, though. Standards evolve, technologies shift, and websites constantly change. No site can realistically reach perfect compliance. The real goal is steady progress — using regular manual accessibility testing to stay close to today’s standards and remain prepared for tomorrow’s standards.

Top view of tester using keyboard for manual accessibility audit.

Showing Your Work

Another way to reduce risk and build trust is to document your efforts. A simple accessibility statement on your website tells users you're paying attention. More formal tools like the Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) and Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) create a public record of where your site stands and what you're working on.

These documents are both evidence and assurance. They show progress to regulators and build trust with the people who use your products.

The Bottom Line on Accessibility Compliance

Accessibility is one of those issues where the costs of doing nothing are far higher than the costs of taking action. Settlements usually range from $5,000 to $20,000 for small businesses — but in some cases can top six-figures. Add in legal fees, brand damage, and lost sales, and the numbers climb quickly.

By contrast, investing in manual accessibility testing, regular web accessibility audits, and transparent reporting pays off in more ways than one. It reduces your exposure to ADA website lawsuit settlement costs, strengthens your reputation, and makes your digital spaces welcoming to everyone.

Our team at PLUS QA can help you put that commitment into practice. We run hands-on accessibility testing and produce clear, developer-ready fixes. We also prepare ACRs and VPATs that document your current standing and demonstrate progress. That way, your stakeholders will see evidence that your company values every person interested in your product.

CONTACT US